最佳大學排名榜 簡介
 最佳大學排名榜 結果公佈
Appendix
|
 |
Frequency Tables
[Q1] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of each university in Hong Kong while taking its local and international reputation, facilities and campus environment, qualification of its teaching staff, academic research performance, overall performance, conduct and quality of students as well as its learning atmosphere, diversification and level of recognition of the courses into consideration, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate (eight universities in rotation)?
|
Average |
Standard error |
No of raters |
Recognition |
HKU |
7.87 |
0.05 |
728 |
70.7% |
CUHK |
7.53 |
0.05 |
725 |
70.5% |
HKUST |
7.16 |
0.06 |
685 |
66.6% |
PolyU |
6.78 |
0.05 |
698 |
67.8% |
HKBU |
6.21 |
0.05 |
679 |
66.0% |
CityU |
6.10 |
0.06 |
659 |
64.0% |
HKIEd |
5.83 |
0.06 |
604 |
58.7% |
Lingnan |
5.44 |
0.06 |
619 |
60.2% |
[Q2] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the level of transparency of each university while taking its performance in consulting its students and teaching staff, releasing information to the mass media as well as explaining to the public and collecting public opinions when carrying out new policies and reforms into consideration, with 0 representing absolutely non-transparent, 10 representing absolutely transparent and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the level of transparency of (eight universities in rotation)?
|
Average |
Standard error |
No of raters |
Recognition |
HKU |
6.64 |
0.07 |
546 |
53.1% |
CUHK |
6.60 |
0.07 |
546 |
53.1% |
HKUST |
6.29 |
0.07 |
514 |
50.0% |
PolyU |
6.17 |
0.07 |
514 |
50.0% |
CityU |
5.82 |
0.07 |
504 |
49.0% |
HKBU |
5.81 |
0.07 |
499 |
48.5% |
HKIEd |
5.59 |
0.08 |
460 |
44.7% |
Lingnan |
5.32 |
0.08 |
477 |
46.4% |
[Q3] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the contribution made by the teaching staff of each university to society while taking their academic research performance, efforts in promoting university image and upgrading its international ranking, participation in social charities as well as their response and commitment to the needs of society into consideration, with 0 representing minimal contribution, 10 representing maximal contribution and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the contribution made by the teaching staff of (eight universities in rotation)?
|
Average |
Standard error |
No of raters |
Recognition |
HKU |
7.28 |
0.06 |
596 |
57.9% |
CUHK |
7.17 |
0.06 |
599 |
58.2% |
HKUST |
6.90 |
0.07 |
565 |
54.9% |
PolyU |
6.51 |
0.07 |
569 |
55.3% |
HKBU |
6.07 |
0.07 |
556 |
54.0% |
CityU |
5.96 |
0.07 |
549 |
53.4% |
HKIEd |
5.86 |
0.08 |
527 |
51.2% |
Lingnan |
5.47 |
0.07 |
514 |
50.0% |
[Q4] Please use a scale of 0-10 to evaluate the overall performance of Vice-Chancellor/President of each university while taking his/her local and international reputation, approachability to the public, leadership, vision, social credibility and public relations into consideration, with 0 representing the worst, 10 representing the best and 5 being half-half. How would you rate the Vice-chancellors/Presidents of (eight universities in rotation)?
|
Average |
Standard error |
No of raters |
Recognition |
HKUST - Prof Paul C.W. CHU |
7.26 |
0.07 |
495 |
48.1% |
CUHK - Prof Arthur K.C. LI |
7.09 |
0.06 |
503 |
48.9% |
HKU - Prof W.I.R. DAVIES |
6.67 |
0.08 |
402 |
39.1% |
PolyU - Prof Chung-kwong POON |
6.56 |
0.07 |
459 |
44.6% |
Lingnan - Prof Edward K.Y. CHEN |
6.48 |
0.07 |
480 |
46.6% |
HKBU - Prof Ching-fai NG |
6.31 |
0.07 |
447 |
43.4% |
CityU - Prof H.K. CHANG |
6.31 |
0.07 |
415 |
40.3% |
HKIEd - Prof Ruth HAYHOE |
5.94 |
0.08 |
378 |
36.7% |
[Q5] Have you ever taken or considered taking any programmes offered by local school of continuing education? All short-term and long-term programmes, academic or interest groups are included, but not the sub-degree programmes and higher diploma programmes.
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Yes – Have taken |
122 |
11.9% |
) |
Yes – Have considered taking |
122 |
11.8% |
) |
Both |
20 |
2.0% |
) 25.7% |
No |
765 |
74.3% |
|
Total |
1,029 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
1,029 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
0 |
|
|
[Q6] Then have you ever taken or considered taking any sub-degree programmes?
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Yes – Have taken |
23 |
2.2% |
) |
Yes – Have considered taking |
45 |
4.3% |
) |
Both |
2 |
0.2% |
) 6.7% |
No |
960 |
93.3% |
|
Total |
1,029 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
1,029 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
0 |
|
|
[Q7] How about higher diploma programmes?
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Yes – Have taken |
65 |
6.3% |
) |
Yes – Have considered taking |
81 |
7.9% |
) |
Both |
5 |
0.5% |
) 14.7% |
No |
876 |
85.3% |
|
Total |
1,027 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
1,029 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
2 |
|
|
[Q8] [Only for those who have ever taken or considered taking these programmes] If you had to take such a programme now, which school of continuing education of the university would you prefer most? (Did not read out the answers, single response only)
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
% of total sample (Base=1,029) |
HKU School of Professional And Continuing Education, HKU |
92 |
29.5% |
8.9% |
School of Continuing Studies, CUHK |
56 |
17.8% |
5.4% |
School of Professional Education and Executive Development, PolyU |
48 |
15.4% |
4.7% |
School of Continuing Education, HKBU |
24 |
7.8% |
2.3% |
Continuing and Professional Education, HKUST |
23 |
7.3% |
2.2% |
School of Continuing and Professional Education, CityU |
14 |
4.5% |
1.4% |
Li Ka Shing Institute of Professional and Continuing Education, OUHK |
10 |
3.3% |
1.0% |
Division of Continuing Professional Education, HKIEd |
8 |
2.5% |
0.8% |
Lingnan Institute of Further Education, Lingnan |
1 |
0.4% |
0.1% |
Other overseas school of continuing education set up in Hong Kong |
1 |
0.4% |
0.1% |
Don't know / hard to say |
35 |
11.2% |
3.4% |
Total |
313 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
316 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
3 |
|
|
[Q9] [Only for those who have ever taken or considered taking these programmes] Then, what are your major reasons for choosing that university? (Did not read out the answers, multiple responses allowed)
|
Frequency |
% of total responses (Base = 426 responses from 279 respondents) |
% of total sample (Base = 1,029) |
Reputation of the institution |
80 |
18.9% |
7.8% |
Practical value of the course |
60 |
14.2% |
5.8% |
Venue/transportation |
55 |
12.9% |
5.3% |
Qualification of its teaching staff |
50 |
11.6% |
4.9% |
Diversification of different courses |
39 |
9.2% |
3.8% |
Word of mouth / recommended by others |
38 |
9.0% |
3.7% |
Recognition of the course |
38 |
9.0% |
3.7% |
Facilities |
13 |
3.2% |
1.3% |
Alumni |
13 |
3.0% |
1.3% |
Entrance requirement |
12 |
2.9% |
1.2% |
Tuition fees |
6 |
1.4% |
0.6% |
Linkage with other institutions |
6 |
1.3% |
0.6% |
Enrolment time table |
5 |
1.3% |
0.5% |
Others (please specify) |
4 |
0.9% |
0.4% |
Don't know / hard to say |
5 |
1.2% |
0.5% |
Total |
426 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
316 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
37 |
|
|
[Q10] Under your job specifications, are you involved, in any way, in the recruitment process of new staff?
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
Yes |
184 |
17.9% |
No |
842 |
82.1% |
|
|
|
Total |
1,026 |
100.0% |
Base |
1,029 |
|
Missing case(s) |
3 |
|
[Q11] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] Then, have you ever recruited university graduates via the career centre or counseling centre?
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
% of total sample
(Base = 1,029) |
Yes |
25 |
13.4% |
2.4% |
No |
159 |
86.6% |
15.5% |
Total |
184 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
184 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
0 |
|
|
[Q12] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] If you looked for a new employee, which university's graduates would you prefer most? (Did not read out the answers, single response only)
|
Frequency |
Percentage |
% of total sample
(Base = 1,029) |
HKU |
44 |
24.0% |
4.3% |
CUHK |
34 |
18.7% |
3.3% |
HKUST |
21 |
11.7% |
2.0% |
PolyU |
11 |
6.2% |
1.1% |
CityU |
6 |
3.0% |
0.6% |
HKBU |
5 |
2.6% |
0.5% |
HKIEd |
2 |
1.1% |
0.2% |
Other overseas universities |
2 |
1.3% |
0.2% |
Others (please specify) |
1 |
0.6% |
0.1% |
Don't know / hard to say |
20 |
10.7% |
1.9% |
No preference |
36 |
19.9% |
3.5% |
Total |
183 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
184 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
1 |
|
|
[Q13] [Only for those who are involved in the recruitment process of new staff] Why would you prefer the graduates of the chosen university? (Did not read out the answers, multiple responses allowed)
|
Frequency |
% of total responses (Base = 178 responses from 127 respondents) |
% of total sample (Base = 1,029) |
Good performance of previous graduates |
68 |
37.8% |
6.6% |
Good knowledge in job-related areas |
26 |
14.4% |
2.5% |
Reputation |
21 |
11.8% |
2.0% |
Good work attitude |
12 |
6.5% |
1.2% |
Diligent, motivated |
12 |
6.5% |
1.2% |
Good language ability |
10 |
5.8% |
1.0% |
Alumni |
7 |
3.8% |
0.7% |
Good connection with outside (e.g., a university's extensive connection with enterprises, companies, or industrial firms; large number of graduates) |
6 |
3.1% |
0.6% |
Good social relationship |
5 |
3.0% |
0.5% |
Good leadership |
4 |
2.3% |
0.4% |
Salary matches ability |
1 |
0.5% |
0.1% |
Others (please specify) |
6 |
3.2% |
0.6% |
Don't know / hard to say |
2 |
1.2% |
0.2% |
Total |
178 |
100.0% |
|
Base |
184 |
|
|
Missing case(s) |
6 |
|
|
|
